A.A. Alemna

623 citations
79 papers · 450 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

A.A. Alemna

73 papers receiving 354 citations

Peers

A.A. Alemna
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Library and Information Sciences 212
  • Information Systems 163
  • History and Philosophy of Science 32
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 48
  • Conservation 16
Replace Linda Ashcroft with:
Linda Ashcroft United Kingdom
Laurel A. Clyde Iceland
Kate Manuel United States
Charles Martell United States
Norman Roberts United Kingdom
Juan D. Machin‐Mastromatteo Mexico
Alejandro Uribe Tirado Colombia
Norliya Ahmad Kassim Malaysia
Judith Broady‐Preston United Kingdom
Niels Ole Pors Denmark
A.A. Alemna relative to Linda Ashcroft United Kingdom Linda Ashcroft's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Linda Ashcroft · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A.A. Alemna

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A.A. Alemna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A.A. Alemna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A.A. Alemna more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A.A. Alemna

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A.A. Alemna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A.A. Alemna. The network helps show where A.A. Alemna may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 1 scholars most cited alongside A.A. Alemna, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A.A. Alemna Line = papers co-authored together A.A. Alemna links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200646
2 199526
3 200126
4 199619
5 199418
6 199917
7 199617
8 200016
9 199412
10
The need for marketing and total quality management strategies in libraries in Ghana
200110
11 200110
12 20058
13 19968
14 19978
15 20028
16 20118
17 19918
18 19918
19 19928
20 19977

About A.A. Alemna

A.A. Alemna is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education, Information Systems, History and Philosophy of Science and Management Information Systems, having authored 79 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (44 papers), Library Science and Administration (32 papers), African Education and Politics (15 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (12 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (10 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (2 papers), Translation Studies and Practices (2 papers) and Digital and Traditional Archives Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (212 citations), Information Systems (163 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (32 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (48 citations) and Conservation (16 citations). A.A. Alemna has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Nigeria and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Knud Erik Skouby. Their work appears in journals such as Information Development, Library Management, Education for Information, Library Review and Journal of Education for Library and Information Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact