Countries where authors publish in Information Development
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Information Development
This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Development.
About Information Development
The 1.4k papers published in Information Development in the last decades have received a total of 15.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Information Development usually cover Library and Information Sciences (236 papers), Information Systems and Management (286 papers), Communication (176 papers), Conservation (75 papers) and Information Systems (439 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (256 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (186 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (179 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (138 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (132 papers), Library Science and Administration (120 papers), E-Government and Public Services (99 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (98 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Development are Tao Zhou, Veera Bhatiasevi, Patrick Ngulube, Tao Zhou, Kiran Kaur, Mehwish Waheed, Yujong Hwang, NoorUl Ain, Khalid Mahmood and Wole Michael Olatokun.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.