Countries where authors publish in Information Development
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Information Development. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Information Development with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Information Development more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Information Development
This network shows the impact of papers published in Information Development. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Information Development.
About Information Development
The 1.4k papers published in Information Development in the last decades have received a total of 15.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Information Development usually cover Library and Information Sciences (238 papers), Information Systems and Management (289 papers), Communication (179 papers), Conservation (76 papers) and Information Systems (445 papers) specifically the topics of Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (258 papers), Library Science and Information Literacy (187 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (180 papers), ICT Impact and Policies (135 papers), Digital Marketing and Social Media (132 papers), Library Science and Administration (122 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (99 papers) and E-Government and Public Services (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Information Development are Tao Zhou, Veera Bhatiasevi, Patrick Ngulube, Tao Zhou, Kiran Kaur, Mehwish Waheed, Yujong Hwang, Noor Ul-Ain, Khalid M. Mahmood and İbrahim Arpacı.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.