A. Peter Johnson

46 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

A. Peter Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 873
  • Organic Chemistry 359
  • Molecular Biology 811
  • Spectroscopy 159
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 73
Replace John S. Delaney with:
John S. Delaney United Kingdom
Uli Fechner Germany
Geoffrey M. Downs United Kingdom
John D. Holliday United Kingdom
Éric Martin United States
Christian Lemmen Germany
Mahendra Awale Switzerland
Sung‐Sau So United States
Ian A. Watson United States
Brian Kelley United States
A. Peter Johnson relative to John S. Delaney United Kingdom John S. Delaney's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.8×
John S. Delaney · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by A. Peter Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A. Peter Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Peter Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Peter Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by A. Peter Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Peter Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Peter Johnson. The network helps show where A. Peter Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Peter Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with A. Peter Johnson Line = papers co-authored together A. Peter Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2006202
2 2009162
3 1993149
4 1994137
5 1997124
6 1995101
7 201179
8 200964
9 201457
10 201451
11 199443
12 200542
13 200641
14 200039
15 200337
16 199533
17 199331
18 199031
19 199230
20 200927

About A. Peter Johnson

A. Peter Johnson is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Spectroscopy, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (13 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (8 papers), Machine Learning in Materials Science (6 papers), Protein Structure and Dynamics (4 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (3 papers), Click Chemistry and Applications (3 papers), Handwritten Text Recognition Techniques (2 papers) and Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (873 citations), Organic Chemistry (359 citations), Molecular Biology (811 citations), Spectroscopy (159 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (73 citations). A. Peter Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Anikó Simon, Zsolt Zsoldos, Valerie J. Gillet, Paulina Mata, Glenn J. Myatt, James Law, William H. Newell, Chris M. Marshall, Sarah Major and Colin W. G. Fishwick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, Tetrahedron, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters and The Journal of Organic Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact