A. Chatterjee
Impact in
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology
- Piperaceae Chemical and Biological Studies
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae
Papers in
-
- Natural product bioactivities and synthesis 8
- Phytochemical compounds biological activities 6
-
- Chemical synthesis and alkaloids 15
- Co-authors
- P.L. Majumder (6 shared papers)Avijit Banerji (5 shared papers)B.C. Das (4 shared papers)D. C. Bradley (2 shared papers)A. B. Ray (5 shared papers)Julie Banerji (14 shared papers)Anita Sahu (2 shared papers)Shyamapada Mandal (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Phytochemistry (14 papers)Tetrahedron Letters (12 papers)Tetrahedron (11 papers)Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (3 papers)Die Naturwissenschaften (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- IndiaUnited StatesFrance
In The Last Decade
A. Chatterjee
81 papers receiving 935 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Pharmacology 311
- Biochemistry 129
- Organic Chemistry 339
- Pharmacology 142
- Plant Science 307
Countries citing papers authored by A. Chatterjee
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Chatterjee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Chatterjee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Chatterjee. The network helps show where A. Chatterjee may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside A. Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 84 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1967 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1970 | 69 | |
| 3 | 1966 | 65 | |
| 4 | 1965 | 43 | |
| 5 | 1956 | 41 | |
| 6 | 1989 | 40 | |
| 7 | 1983 | 30 | |
| 8 | 1981 | 28 | |
| 9 | 1977 | 28 | |
| 10 | 1970 | 26 | |
| 11 | 1968 | 25 | |
| 12 | 1987 | 25 | |
| 13 | 1975 | 24 | |
| 14 | 1988 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1957 | 22 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 20 | |
| 17 | 1966 | 19 | |
| 18 | 1971 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1965 | 17 | |
| 20 | 1966 | 16 |
About A. Chatterjee
A. Chatterjee is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Organic Chemistry, Plant Science, Pharmacology and Pharmacology, having authored 84 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (15 papers), Plant chemical constituents analysis (11 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (10 papers), Traditional and Medicinal Uses of Annonaceae (10 papers), Alkaloids: synthesis and pharmacology (9 papers), Natural product bioactivities and synthesis (8 papers), Phytochemical compounds biological activities (6 papers) and Sesquiterpenes and Asteraceae Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (311 citations), Biochemistry (129 citations), Organic Chemistry (339 citations), Pharmacology (142 citations) and Plant Science (307 citations). A. Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include P.L. Majumder, Avijit Banerji, B.C. Das, D. C. Bradley, A. B. Ray, Julie Banerji, Anita Sahu, Shyamapada Mandal, K. Biemann and James Ν. Shoolery. Their work appears in journals such as Phytochemistry, Tetrahedron Letters, Tetrahedron, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences and Die Naturwissenschaften.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.