Revue Théologique de Louvain

725 papers and 516 indexed citations i.

About

The 725 papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain in the last decades have received a total of 516 indexed citations. Papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain usually cover Religious studies (310 papers), Sociology and Political Science (210 papers) and History (81 papers) specifically the topics of Theology and Canon Law Studies (188 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (133 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (78 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue Théologique de Louvain are Philippe Weber, Pierre-Maurice Bogaert, André de Halleux, Vassilis Saroglou, Jacques Scheuer, Jean-Michel Counet, D. L. Lambert, Karel Dobbelaere, Antoine Vergote and Jacques Dupont.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain.

Countries where authors publish in Revue Théologique de Louvain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue Théologique de Louvain. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue Théologique de Louvain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue Théologique de Louvain more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025