Countries where authors publish in Materials Evaluation
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Materials Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Materials Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Materials Evaluation more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Materials Evaluation
This network shows the impact of papers published in Materials Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Materials Evaluation.
About Materials Evaluation
The 848 papers published in Materials Evaluation in the last decades have received a total of 6.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Materials Evaluation usually cover Mechanics of Materials (438 papers), Mechanical Engineering (434 papers), Metals and Alloys (29 papers), Ocean Engineering (119 papers) and Civil and Structural Engineering (154 papers) specifically the topics of Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (341 papers), Non-Destructive Testing Techniques (316 papers), Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (107 papers), Geophysical Methods and Applications (106 papers), Thermography and Photoacoustic Techniques (80 papers), Structural Health Monitoring Techniques (60 papers), Engineering Applied Research (38 papers) and Magnetic Properties and Applications (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Materials Evaluation are Joseph Lawrence Rose, P. Cawley, Alex Vary, N. N. Hsu, Hegeon Kwun, Reza Zoughi, Sándor Popovics, David N. Alleyne, M. J. S. Lowe and Neil J. Goldfine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.