Forum for Development Studies

621 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 621 papers published in Forum for Development Studies in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Forum for Development Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (263 papers), Development (175 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (173 papers) specifically the topics of International Development and Aid (173 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (57 papers) and Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (54 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Forum for Development Studies are Yen Nee Wong, Øyvind Eggen, Kristin M. Haugevik, James Murombedzi, William M. Adams, Jon Hutton, Hira Amin, Sian Sullivan, Tor A. Benjaminsen and Ole Therkildsen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Forum for Development Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Forum for Development Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Forum for Development Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Forum for Development Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Forum for Development Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Forum for Development Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Forum for Development Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025