Wine Economics and Policy

202 papers and 3.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 202 papers published in Wine Economics and Policy in the last decades have received a total of 3.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Wine Economics and Policy usually cover Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management (186 papers), Plant Science (133 papers) and Food Science (77 papers) specifically the topics of Wine Industry and Tourism (186 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (110 papers) and Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Wine Economics and Policy are Riccardo Vecchio, Liz Thach, Gergely Szolnoki, Larry Lockshin, Dieter Hoffmann, Armando Maria Corsi, Eugenio Pomarici, D. Christopher Taylor, Ricardo Sellers Rubio and Graziella Benedetto.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Wine Economics and Policy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Wine Economics and Policy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Wine Economics and Policy.

Countries where authors publish in Wine Economics and Policy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Wine Economics and Policy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Wine Economics and Policy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wine Economics and Policy more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025