Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology

5.2k citations
330 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors 33
    • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 31
    • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias 24
    • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes 22
    • Heart Failure Treatment and Management 22
    • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise 16
    • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair 18

Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology

276 papers receiving 4.4k citations

Peers

Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology
Comparison fields: 5 of 159
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.2k
  • Health Informatics 36
  • Nephrology 164
  • Surgery 828
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 436
Replace European Cardiology Review with:
European Cardiology Review United Kingdom
Cardiac failure review United States
Cardiology and Therapy United States
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy United States
Biomarker Insights United States
Journal of Stroke South Korea
Military Medical Research China
Evidence-Based Mental Health United Kingdom
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research India
Therapeutic Advances in Endocrinology and Metabolism United States
Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology relative to European Cardiology Review United Kingdom European Cardiology Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.7×
European Cardiology Review · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology.

About Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology

The 330 papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology in the last decades have received a total of 5.2k indexed citations . Papers published in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology usually cover Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (174 papers), Surgery (69 papers), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (35 papers), Geriatrics and Gerontology (5 papers) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (43 papers) specifically the topics of Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (33 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (31 papers), Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (30 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (24 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (22 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (22 papers), Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (18 papers) and Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Clinical Medicine Insights Cardiology are DeLisa Fairweather, Antoine Kossaify, Tetsuji Miura, Shigeyuki Saitoh, Kazuaki Shimamoto, Masato Furuhashi, Gerin R. Stevens, Monica Mukherjee, Garth Graham and Jiaqi Liu.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact