Artificial Intelligence

324.9k citations
3.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
    • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
    • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
    • Logic, programming, and type systems
  • Software top 0.5%

Papers in

    • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge 1.1k
    • AI-based Problem Solving and Planning 755
    • Semantic Web and Ontologies 583
    • Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation 403
    • Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference 366
    • Logic, programming, and type systems 288

Artificial Intelligence

3.2k papers receiving 282.2k citations

Peers

Artificial Intelligence
Comparison fields: 5 of 248
  • Artificial Intelligence 202.3k
  • Software 11.4k
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 40.0k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 55.2k
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 48.5k
Replace ACM Computing Surveys with:
ACM Computing Surveys United States
Technometrics United States
Journal of the ACM United States
Machine Learning United States
Proceedings of the IEEE United States
Applied Soft Computing China
IEEE Transactions on Computers United States
Computer United States
Theoretical Computer Science United States
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering China
Artificial Intelligence relative to ACM Computing Surveys United States ACM Computing Surveys's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
ACM Computing Surveys · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Artificial Intelligence

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Artificial Intelligence. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Artificial Intelligence with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Artificial Intelligence more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Artificial Intelligence

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Artificial Intelligence. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Artificial Intelligence.

About Artificial Intelligence

The 3.4k papers published in Artificial Intelligence in the last decades have received a total of 324.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Artificial Intelligence usually cover Artificial Intelligence (2.5k papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (658 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (698 papers), Management Science and Operations Research (366 papers) and Software (103 papers) specifically the topics of Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (1.1k papers), AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (755 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (583 papers), Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization (537 papers), Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (403 papers), Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference (366 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (288 papers) and Data Management and Algorithms (232 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Artificial Intelligence are Nils J. Nilsson, Raymond Reiter, Berthold K. P. Horn, Brian G. Schunck, Judea Pearl, Rodney A. Brooks, Johan de Kleer, Ron Kohavi, George H. John and Phan Minh Dũng.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact