Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open

702 papers and 4.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 702 papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open in the last decades have received a total of 4.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open usually cover Emergency Medicine (397 papers), Surgery (317 papers) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (127 papers) specifically the topics of Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (317 papers), Trauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation (100 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (99 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open are Eileen M. Bulger, Kimberly A. Davis, Cordelie E. Witt, David A. Spain, David V. Feliciano, Ram Nirula, Christopher P. Michetti, Thomas M. Scalea, Rachael A. Callcut and Alec Beekley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open.

Countries where authors publish in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trauma Surgery & Acute Care Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025