Tree-Ring Research

255 papers and 6.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 255 papers published in Tree-Ring Research in the last decades have received a total of 6.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Tree-Ring Research usually cover Atmospheric Science (218 papers), Global and Planetary Change (194 papers) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (78 papers) specifically the topics of Tree-ring climate responses (217 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (171 papers) and Forest ecology and management (53 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tree-Ring Research are Henri D. Grissino‐Mayer, Valérie Trouet, Fares Qeadan, Franco Biondi, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Markus Stoffel, Christophe Corona, Tom Levanič, Kenneth H. Orvis and Carolyn A. Copenheaver.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tree-Ring Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tree-Ring Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tree-Ring Research.

Countries where authors publish in Tree-Ring Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tree-Ring Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tree-Ring Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tree-Ring Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025