This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Anthropocene. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Anthropocene with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthropocene more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Anthropocene. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Anthropocene.
About Anthropocene
The 437 papers published in Anthropocene in the last decades have received a total of 11.5k indexed citations . Papers published in Anthropocene usually cover Atmospheric Science (155 papers), Global and Planetary Change (160 papers), Paleontology (48 papers), Earth-Surface Processes (45 papers) and Soil Science (59 papers) specifically the topics of Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (122 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (52 papers), Soil erosion and sediment transport (50 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (45 papers), Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes (39 papers), Flood Risk Assessment and Management (33 papers), Isotope Analysis in Ecology (29 papers) and Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management (29 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Anthropocene are Jon M. Erlandson, L. Allan James, Melinda A. Zeder, Bruce D. Smith, Paolo Tarolli, Anna Roosevelt, Todd J. Braje, Nunzio Romano, Federico Preti and Andrew Y. Glikson.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.