Tobacco Prevention & Cessation

560 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 560 papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation usually cover Physiology (314 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (154 papers) and General Health Professions (86 papers) specifically the topics of Smoking Behavior and Cessation (314 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (94 papers) and Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology (76 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation are Daniel Tzu-Hsuan Chen, Kandi L. Walker, Joy L. Hart, Clara G. Sears, Courteney Smith, Allison Siu, Catherine Haighton, Hein de Vries, Johannes Thrul and Carla J. Berg.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation.

Countries where authors publish in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Tobacco Prevention & Cessation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tobacco Prevention & Cessation more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025