Journal of Postcolonial Writing

949 papers and 2.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 949 papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing in the last decades have received a total of 2.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (425 papers), Sociology and Political Science (364 papers) and Anthropology (158 papers) specifically the topics of Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (312 papers), South Asian Cinema and Culture (92 papers) and South Asian Studies and Diaspora (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Postcolonial Writing are Anindya Sekhar Purakayastha, Madina Tlostanova, Dominic Alessio, Tabish Khair, Sonya Andermahr, Irene Visser, Peter Morey, Paul Sharrad, Neil Lazarus and Stephanie Newell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Postcolonial Writing

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Postcolonial Writing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Postcolonial Writing more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025