Pastoral Care in Education

911 papers and 5.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 911 papers published in Pastoral Care in Education in the last decades have received a total of 5.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Pastoral Care in Education usually cover Education (504 papers), Clinical Psychology (257 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (232 papers) specifically the topics of Religious Education and Schools (137 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (125 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (89 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Pastoral Care in Education are Giles Barrow, Carol Mutch, Ron Best, Ken Reid, Helen Cowie, Bridget Cooper, Caroline Lodge, Eleanor Formby, Noel Purdy and Péter Lang.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Pastoral Care in Education

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Pastoral Care in Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Pastoral Care in Education.

Countries where authors publish in Pastoral Care in Education

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Pastoral Care in Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Pastoral Care in Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pastoral Care in Education more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025