The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory

725 papers and 861 indexed citations i.

About

The 725 papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory in the last decades have received a total of 861 indexed citations. Papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (256 papers), Philosophy (107 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (100 papers) specifically the topics of German Literature and Culture Studies (164 papers), Literature and Cultural Memory (99 papers) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory are Julia Hell, Leslie A. Adelson, Sigrid Weigel, Detlef Pollack, Fatima El-Tayeb, Jack Zipes, Stuart Taberner, Todd H. Weir, Alan Dundes and Hans Eichner.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory.

Countries where authors publish in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Germanic Review Literature Culture Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025