Victorian periodicals review

1.0k citations
390 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship
    • Literature: history, themes, analysis
  • History top 10%
    • Travel Writing and Literature
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
    • Scottish History and National Identity

Papers in

    • Literature: history, themes, analysis 43
    • Digital Humanities and Scholarship 37
    • Travel Writing and Literature 48
    • Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes 33
    • Cultural History and Identity Formation 26

Victorian periodicals review

174 papers receiving 404 citations

Peers

Victorian periodicals review
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Literature and Literary Theory 430
  • History 344
  • Museology 79
  • History and Philosophy of Science 103
  • Anthropology 171
Replace Media History with:
Media History United Kingdom
Eighteenth-Century Life United States
Book history Canada
Early Popular Visual Culture United Kingdom
Journal of Spanish Cultural Studies United States
Parergon Australia
Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies United States
Early American literature United States
Studies in eighteenth century culture India
˜The œEighteenth century/˜The œeighteenth century (Lubbock, Tex. Online) United States
Victorian periodicals review relative to Media History United Kingdom Media History's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Media History · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Victorian periodicals review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Victorian periodicals review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Victorian periodicals review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victorian periodicals review more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Victorian periodicals review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Victorian periodicals review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Victorian periodicals review.

About Victorian periodicals review

The 390 papers published in Victorian periodicals review in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Victorian periodicals review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (166 papers), History (130 papers), Museology (42 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (39 papers) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (19 papers) specifically the topics of Travel Writing and Literature (48 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (43 papers), Australian History and Society (39 papers), Digital Humanities and Scholarship (37 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (33 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (28 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (28 papers) and Cultural History and Identity Formation (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Victorian periodicals review are Linda K. Hughes, James Mussell, Paul Fyfe, Laurel Brake, Mark Turner, Joanne Shattock, Margaret Beetham, Brian Maidment, Julie Codell and Patrick Leary.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact