Victorian periodicals review

365 papers and 729 indexed citations

About

The 365 papers published in Victorian periodicals review in the last decades have received a total of 729 indexed citations. Papers published in Victorian periodicals review usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (158 papers), History (120 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (102 papers) specifically the topics of Travel Writing and Literature (45 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (41 papers) and Digital Humanities and Scholarship (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Victorian periodicals review are Linda K. Hughes, James Mussell, Paul Fyfe, Laurel Brake, Mark Turner, Margaret Beetham, Talia Schaffer, Julie Codell, Brian Maidment and Patrick G. Scott.

In The Last Decade

Victorian periodicals review

124 papers receiving 244 citations

Fields of papers published in Victorian periodicals review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Victorian periodicals review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Victorian periodicals review.

Countries where authors publish in Victorian periodicals review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Victorian periodicals review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Victorian periodicals review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Victorian periodicals review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026