Digest of Middle East Studies

424 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 424 papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (272 papers), Political Science and International Relations (198 papers) and Archeology (37 papers) specifically the topics of Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (118 papers), Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (109 papers) and Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (69 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Digest of Middle East Studies are Manochehr Dorraj, Louise Marlow, Mordecai Lee, Abdulfattah Yaghi, Sameen Ahmed Khan, Nader Entessar, Ronald W. Davis, Norzarina Mohd Zaharim, Sandra Mackey and P. R. Kumaraswamy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Digest of Middle East Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Digest of Middle East Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Digest of Middle East Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Digest of Middle East Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025