Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery

561 papers and 2.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 561 papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery in the last decades have received a total of 2.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery usually cover Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (494 papers), Surgery (287 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (138 papers) specifically the topics of Foot and Ankle Surgery (444 papers), Tendon Structure and Treatment (354 papers) and Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation (219 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery are Beat Hintermann, Robert B. Anderson, Vinod K. Panchbhavi, Markus Knupp, James P. Tasto, George B. Holmes, Jorge I. Acevedo, Víctor Valderrábano, Peter G. Mangone and Pau Golanó.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery.

Countries where authors publish in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Techniques in Foot & Ankle Surgery more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025