ACM SIGBED Review

414 papers and 2.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 414 papers published in ACM SIGBED Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.5k indexed citations. Papers published in ACM SIGBED Review usually cover Hardware and Architecture (267 papers), Computer Networks and Communications (200 papers) and Computational Theory and Mathematics (61 papers) specifically the topics of Real-Time Systems Scheduling (198 papers), Embedded Systems Design Techniques (162 papers) and Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (118 papers). The most active scholars publishing in ACM SIGBED Review are Tommaso Melodia, Dario Pompili, Ian F. Akyildiz, Steve Goddard, Lucia Lo Bello, John A. Stankovic, Giorgio Buttazzo, Paul Pop, Lance C. Pérez and Tarek Abdelzaher.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in ACM SIGBED Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in ACM SIGBED Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in ACM SIGBED Review.

Countries where authors publish in ACM SIGBED Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in ACM SIGBED Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in ACM SIGBED Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites ACM SIGBED Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025