Studies in World Christianity

316 papers and 665 indexed citations i.

About

The 316 papers published in Studies in World Christianity in the last decades have received a total of 665 indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in World Christianity usually cover Sociology and Political Science (217 papers), Religious studies (118 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (44 papers) specifically the topics of Transformation of Global Christianity since 1945 (86 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (83 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (39 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in World Christianity are J. Kwabena Asamoah‐Gyadu, Adriaan van Klinken, Cephas N. Omenyo, Afe Adogame, Tim Hutchings, Andrew F. Walls, Musa W. Dube, Deanna Ferree Womack, James L. Cox and Andrew Parker.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in World Christianity

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in World Christianity. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in World Christianity.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in World Christianity

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in World Christianity. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in World Christianity with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in World Christianity more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025