Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift

619 citations
277 papers · · active since 1955

Impact in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
    • Helminth infection and control
    • Veterinary Medicine and Surgery
    • Vector-borne infectious diseases

Papers in

    • Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies 43
    • Veterinary Medicine and Surgery 16
    • Helminth infection and control 14
    • Vector-borne infectious diseases 13

Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift

237 papers receiving 579 citations

Peers

Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Small Animals 197
  • Parasitology 73
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 20
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 81
  • Insect Science 52
Replace Veterinaria italiana with:
Veterinaria italiana Italy
Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery Italy
Inflammatory Intestinal Diseases Japan
International Journal of Inflammation United States
Current Clinical Microbiology Reports United States
International Journal of Veterinary Science and Medicine Egypt
Journal of Intercultural Ethnopharmacology India
Bioscience of Microbiota Food and Health Japan
Mobile DNA United States
Jūigaku kenkyū/Japanese journal of veterinary research Japan
Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift relative to Veterinaria italiana Italy Veterinaria italiana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8×10×
Veterinaria italiana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift.

About Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift

The 277 papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift in the last decades have received a total of 619 indexed citations . Papers published in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift usually cover Small Animals (101 papers), Parasitology (31 papers), Agronomy and Crop Science (45 papers), Equine (8 papers) and Animal Science and Zoology (34 papers) specifically the topics of Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (43 papers), Reproductive Physiology in Livestock (17 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (17 papers), Veterinary Medicine and Surgery (16 papers), Helminth infection and control (14 papers), Animal Virus Infections Studies (13 papers), Vector-borne infectious diseases (13 papers) and Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock (13 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Berliner und Münchener tierärztliche Wochenschrift are Karsten Donat, Chuleui Jung, Sampat Ghosh, Victor Benno Meyer‐Rochow, Heike Köhler, Nils Th. Grabowski, Lars Lewejohann, Mārtiņš Seržants, Stefania D’Amato and Michael Helmut Erhard.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact