International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

846 citations
238 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

174 papers receiving 706 citations

Peers

International Journal of Intellectual Property Management
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 272
  • Business and International Management 42
  • Strategy and Management 243
  • Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management 17
  • Economics and Econometrics 224
Replace Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences with:
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences Romania
˜The œJournal of private enterprise United States
Voluntary Sector Review United Kingdom
Periodica Polytechnica Social and Management Sciences Hungary
Economics Management and Financial Markets United States
Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie Germany
European Journal of Futures Research Germany
International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development Italy
Journal of futures studies Australia
Research in the sociology of work United States
International Journal of Intellectual Property Management relative to Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences Romania Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Intellectual Property Management more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management.

About International Journal of Intellectual Property Management

The 238 papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management in the last decades have received a total of 846 indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management usually cover Management of Technology and Innovation (88 papers), Business and International Management (6 papers), Accounting (30 papers), Marketing (23 papers) and Economics and Econometrics (66 papers) specifically the topics of Intellectual Property and Patents (74 papers), Innovation Policy and R&D (29 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (21 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (21 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (18 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (18 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (17 papers) and Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Intellectual Property Management are Paavo Ritala, Pedro Roffe, Michael Blakeney, Marit Hansen, Richard Elliott, Wojciech Czakon, Ulrich Lichtenthaler, Ahmed Bounfour, José María Martí­n Martí­n and José Manuel Guaita Martínez.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact