Countries where authors publish in Strategic Analysis
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Strategic Analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Strategic Analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Strategic Analysis more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Strategic Analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Strategic Analysis.
About Strategic Analysis
The 1.4k papers published in Strategic Analysis in the last decades have received a total of 5.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Strategic Analysis usually cover General Energy (43 papers), Political Science and International Relations (924 papers), Development (116 papers), Transportation (71 papers) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (84 papers) specifically the topics of Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (360 papers), South Asian Studies and Conflicts (266 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (243 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (127 papers), International Development and Aid (115 papers), Nuclear Issues and Defense (107 papers), Peacebuilding and International Security (105 papers) and Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (103 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Strategic Analysis are Uttam K. Sinha, Nihar R. Nayak, Arild Moe, Michael Clarke, Samuel Oyewole, Alok Bansal, Piyali Ghosh, Arvind Gupta, Farah Naaz and Rohan D’Souza.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.