Asian perspective

845 papers and 3.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 845 papers published in Asian perspective in the last decades have received a total of 3.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Asian perspective usually cover Sociology and Political Science (415 papers), Political Science and International Relations (389 papers) and Development (92 papers) specifically the topics of Korean Peninsula Historical and Political Studies (162 papers), International Relations and Foreign Policy (134 papers) and International Development and Aid (92 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Asian perspective are Leslie Elliott Armijo, Mark Beeson, Cecilia Cheng, Kheang Un, Dali L. Yang, Samuel S. Kim, Kam Wing Chan, Mark J. Valencia, Ashley Esarey and Jean‐Marc F. Blanchard.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Asian perspective

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Asian perspective. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Asian perspective.

Countries where authors publish in Asian perspective

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Asian perspective. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Asian perspective with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asian perspective more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025