The Round Table

1.7k papers and 5.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in The Round Table in the last decades have received a total of 5.8k indexed citations. Papers published in The Round Table usually cover Political Science and International Relations (618 papers), Sociology and Political Science (546 papers) and Demography (190 papers) specifically the topics of Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism (186 papers), Island Studies and Pacific Affairs (177 papers) and International Development and Aid (101 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Round Table are Godfrey Baldacchino, Georgina Holmes, Ian Taylor, Peter Clegg, Derek McDougall, Roger Mac Ginty, John Connell, Robert Muggah, Dag Anckar and William Vlcek.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in The Round Table

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in The Round Table. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Round Table.

Countries where authors publish in The Round Table

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Round Table. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Round Table with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Round Table more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025