Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Reviews and Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.
About Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
The 953 papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports usually cover Genetics (272 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (36 papers), Urology (38 papers), Molecular Biology (457 papers) and Cancer Research (90 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (261 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (157 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (122 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (103 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (66 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (62 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (54 papers) and CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (52 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports are Henning Ulrich, Ali Golchin, Micheli Mainardi Pillat, Richard G. Fessler, Brian T. David, Matthew Trawczynski, Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Ehsan Seyedjafari and Deepa Bhartiya.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.