Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Reviews and Reports more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports.
About Stem Cell Reviews and Reports
The 913 papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports in the last decades have received a total of 12.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports usually cover Genetics (298 papers), Developmental Neuroscience (37 papers), Cancer Research (106 papers), Molecular Biology (475 papers) and Urology (42 papers) specifically the topics of Mesenchymal stem cell research (286 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (155 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (134 papers), Extracellular vesicles in disease (111 papers), MicroRNA in disease regulation (80 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (65 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (59 papers) and 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Reviews and Reports are Henning Ulrich, Micheli Mainardi Pillat, Ali Golchin, Abdolreza Ardeshirylajimi, Mariusz Z. Ratajczak, Ehsan Seyedjafari, Brian T. David, Matthew Trawczynski, Richard G. Fessler and Deepa Bhartiya.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.