Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Research.
About Stem Cell Research
The 3.2k papers published in Stem Cell Research in the last decades have received a total of 46.6k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cell Research usually cover Molecular Biology (2.5k papers), Developmental Neuroscience (136 papers), Genetics (343 papers), Aging (48 papers) and Genetics (541 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1.6k papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1.2k papers), Renal and related cancers (323 papers), Congenital heart defects research (207 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (186 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (182 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (160 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Research are Andre B.H. Choo, Gerard Pasterkamp, Sai Kiang Lim, Fatih Arslan, Leo Timmers, Ruenn Chai Lai, Dominique P.V. de Kleijn, Pieter A. Doevendans, Reida Menshawe El Oakley and Chuen Neng Lee.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.