Sports Coaching Review

248 papers and 2.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 248 papers published in Sports Coaching Review in the last decades have received a total of 2.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Sports Coaching Review usually cover Developmental and Educational Psychology (188 papers), Social Psychology (119 papers) and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (105 papers) specifically the topics of Sport Psychology and Performance (184 papers), Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports (106 papers) and Physical Education and Pedagogy (104 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sports Coaching Review are Christopher J. Cushion, Joseph P. Mills, Nicole M. LaVoi, Jim Denison, Robyn L. Jones, Lee Nelson, Anna Stodter, Paul Potrac, Leanne Norman and Brian Gearity.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sports Coaching Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sports Coaching Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sports Coaching Review.

Countries where authors publish in Sports Coaching Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sports Coaching Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sports Coaching Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sports Coaching Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025