Occupational Ergonomics

223 papers and 1.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 223 papers published in Occupational Ergonomics in the last decades have received a total of 1.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Occupational Ergonomics usually cover Social Psychology (133 papers), Pharmacology (123 papers) and Biomedical Engineering (51 papers) specifically the topics of Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (123 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (119 papers) and Effects of Vibration on Health (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Occupational Ergonomics are Vincent G. Duffy, David G. Behm, Brian H. Dalton, Helmut Strasser, Calvin Kalun Or, Clark R. Dickerson, Waldemar Karwowski, Jack P. Callaghan, Paul Succop and Klaus Bengler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Occupational Ergonomics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Occupational Ergonomics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Occupational Ergonomics.

Countries where authors publish in Occupational Ergonomics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Occupational Ergonomics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Occupational Ergonomics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Occupational Ergonomics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025