Advances in Nursing Science

1.5k papers and 44.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.5k papers published in Advances in Nursing Science in the last decades have received a total of 44.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Nursing Science usually cover General Health Professions (556 papers), Sociology and Political Science (303 papers) and Clinical Psychology (290 papers) specifically the topics of Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (119 papers), Ethics in medical practice (118 papers) and Nursing education and management (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Nursing Science are Margarete Sandelowski, Peter Benner, Janice M. Morse, Afaf Ibrahim Meleis, Victoria L. Champion, Marjorie J. Powers, Carol Estwing Ferrans, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, Joanne M. Hall and Patricia E. Stevens.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Nursing Science

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Nursing Science. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Nursing Science.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Nursing Science

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Nursing Science. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Nursing Science with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Nursing Science more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025