Software Testing Verification and Reliability

13.9k citations
545 papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

  • Software top 0.5%
    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
    • Software Engineering Research

Papers in

    • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques 405
    • Software Reliability and Analysis Research 320
    • Software Engineering Research 241

Software Testing Verification and Reliability

487 papers receiving 12.8k citations

Peers

Software Testing Verification and Reliability
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
  • Software 12.0k
  • Information Systems 7.9k
  • Hardware and Architecture 1.2k
  • Signal Processing 1.5k
  • Computer Networks and Communications 2.9k
Replace Automated Software Engineering with:
Automated Software Engineering United States
The Journal of Object Technology United States
IET Software China
Requirements Engineering United Kingdom
Formal Methods in System Design United States
Computer Science Review India
Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering India
Queue United States
ACM Transactions on Information and System Security United States
Journal of Computer Security United States
Software Testing Verification and Reliability relative to Automated Software Engineering United States Automated Software Engineering's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Automated Software Engineering · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Software Testing Verification and Reliability

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Software Testing Verification and Reliability more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability.

About Software Testing Verification and Reliability

The 545 papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Software Testing Verification and Reliability usually cover Software (459 papers), Information Systems (268 papers), Hardware and Architecture (52 papers), Computational Theory and Mathematics (88 papers) and Computer Networks and Communications (110 papers) specifically the topics of Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (405 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (320 papers), Software Engineering Research (241 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (96 papers), Formal Methods in Verification (83 papers), Advanced Malware Detection Techniques (41 papers), Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies (26 papers) and VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Software Testing Verification and Reliability are Phil McMinn, Mark Harman, Shin Yoo, Jeff Offutt, Andrea Arcuri, Mary Jean Harrold, Lionel Briand, A. Jefferson Offutt, Yong Rae Kwon and Yu‐Seung Ma.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact