Advances in Wound Care

730 papers and 30.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 730 papers published in Advances in Wound Care in the last decades have received a total of 30.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Advances in Wound Care usually cover Rehabilitation (482 papers), Surgery (226 papers) and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (142 papers) specifically the topics of Wound Healing and Treatments (477 papers), Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (142 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Advances in Wound Care are Robert G. Frykberg, Jaminelli Banks, Traci A. Wilgus, Steven L. Percival, Chris Jackson, Meilang Xue, Kelly E. Johnson, Richard J. Bodnar, Edward J. Caterson and Sara McCarty.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Advances in Wound Care

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Advances in Wound Care. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Advances in Wound Care.

Countries where authors publish in Advances in Wound Care

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Advances in Wound Care. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Advances in Wound Care with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Advances in Wound Care more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025