positions asia critique

779 papers and 4.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 779 papers published in positions asia critique in the last decades have received a total of 4.3k indexed citations. Papers published in positions asia critique usually cover Sociology and Political Science (446 papers), Cultural Studies (302 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (128 papers) specifically the topics of Japanese History and Culture (236 papers), Chinese history and philosophy (153 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (110 papers). The most active scholars publishing in positions asia critique are Brian Massumi, Tamara Jacka, Aihwa Ong, Rosalind C. Morris, Ann Anagnost, Luigi Tomba, Jing Wang, Christina Schwenkel, Terry Woronov and Tani E. Barlow.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in positions asia critique

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in positions asia critique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in positions asia critique.

Countries where authors publish in positions asia critique

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in positions asia critique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in positions asia critique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites positions asia critique more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025