James E. Armstrong

19 papers receiving 274 citations

Peers

James E. Armstrong
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 109
  • Urology 35
  • Demography 39
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 41
  • Linguistics and Language 7
Replace Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου with:
Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου Greece
Daniela Buonanno Italy
Fernanda Feijão Hungary
Volkan Topçuoğlu Türkiye
María Mercedes Ovejero Bruna Spain
Stuart P. Taylor United States
Ralph E. Tarter United States
Paul M. Hurst United States
Katrin Boström Sweden
Sharon Messenheimer Kelley United States
James E. Armstrong relative to Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου Greece Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.0×
Παναγιώτα Κορκολιάκου · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Armstrong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Armstrong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Armstrong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Armstrong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Armstrong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Armstrong. The network helps show where James E. Armstrong may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside James E. Armstrong, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Armstrong Line = papers co-authored together James E. Armstrong links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Immigration to Israel: Sociological Perspectives
200169
2 197448
3 201634
4 200730
5 201025
6 201019
7 201419
8 200614
9 201410
10 201910
11 19928
12 19696
13 19932
14 20082
15 20011
16 20071
17 20091
18 20211
19 20221
20
Shelley's Unsung Muse: Eliza O'Neill and the Inspiration Behind The Cenci
20150

About James E. Armstrong

James E. Armstrong is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Urology, Demography, Music and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 20 papers that have together received 301 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (7 papers), Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research (4 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (3 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (2 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers), Metallurgy and Cultural Artifacts (1 paper) and Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pathology and Forensic Medicine (109 citations), Urology (35 citations), Demography (39 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (41 citations) and Linguistics and Language (7 citations). James E. Armstrong has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Colin Martindale, Charles H. Hubscher, Richard D. Johnson, April N. Herrity, Susan J. Harkema, Daya Shankar Gupta, William R Reed, Stephen M. Onifer, Beth E. Meyerson and Stephanie A. Sanders. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Research, Journal of Pain, Experimental Neurology, American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology and Journal of Visualized Experiments.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact