Scriptorium
Impact in
Papers in
In The Last Decade
Scriptorium
249 papers receiving 594 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Classics 1.9k
- History 1.3k
- History and Philosophy of Science 324
- Anthropology 581
- Archeology 461
Countries where authors publish in Scriptorium
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Scriptorium. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Scriptorium with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scriptorium more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Scriptorium
This network shows the impact of papers published in Scriptorium. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Scriptorium.
About Scriptorium
The 845 papers published in Scriptorium in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations . Papers published in Scriptorium usually cover Classics (295 papers), History (222 papers), Anthropology (177 papers), Archeology (183 papers) and Language and Linguistics (146 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Literature and History (123 papers), Classical Antiquity Studies (108 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (99 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (97 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (83 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (82 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (74 papers) and Historical and Literary Studies (68 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Scriptorium are Richard Bowdler Sharpe, Richard Gameson, Ludwig Bieler, Jean Irigoin, Michael McCormick, Jean Vezin, Elisabeth Okasha, Marilena Maniaci, Leslie Brubaker and Richard A. Marsden.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.