NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin
253 papers
receiving
913 citations
Peers
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin
Comparison fields: 5 of 178
History and Philosophy of Science294
Theoretical Computer Science73
History211
General Psychology19
Geography, Planning and Development51
Replace Intellectual History Review with:
Intellectual History ReviewUnited States
Historical Studies in the Natural SciencesUnited States
DynamisSpain
Revue internationale de philosophieFrance
Revue d Histoire des Sciences HumainesFrance
SententiaeUkraine
Zeitschrift für philosophische ForschungGermany
Philosophia ChristiUnited States
Physics in PerspectiveUnited States
Journal of the Philosophy of HistoryUnited States
NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizinrelative toIntellectual History ReviewUnited StatesIntellectual History Review's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6.1×
Intellectual History Review · 1×
×0.7294/421HPS
×6.173/12TCS
×0.7211/297HISTO
×1.619/12GP
×1.551/34GPD
Citations per year
'16
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24
'25
'26
Countries where authors publish in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin more than expected).
Fields of papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin
This network shows the impact of papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin.
About NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin
The 452 papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations . Papers published in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin usually cover Theoretical Computer Science (29 papers), History and Philosophy of Science (97 papers), History (88 papers), General Psychology (8 papers) and Classics (14 papers) specifically the topics of Medical History and Research (48 papers), German Social Sciences and History (41 papers), European history and politics (33 papers), History and Theory of Mathematics (29 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (29 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (28 papers), Twentieth Century Scientific Developments (27 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (20 papers). The most active scholars publishing in NTM Zeitschrift für Geschichte der Wissenschaften Technik und Medizin are Helmuth Trischler, Sibylle Fischer, David Nilsson, Lutz J. Heinrich, Mitchell G. Ash, Ursula Klein, Maria Kronfeldner, Uwe Hoßfeld, Gert Schubring and Peter Weingart.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.