Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

212 papers and 1.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 212 papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open in the last decades have received a total of 1.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open usually cover Psychiatry and Mental health (131 papers), Cognitive Neuroscience (62 papers) and Clinical Psychology (54 papers) specifically the topics of Schizophrenia research and treatment (123 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (38 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (37 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open are ­ Anonymous, Clive E Adams, Farhad Shokraneh, Donald Addington, Kathryn Greenwood, Lena Palaniyappan, Brian O’Donoghue, Patrick D. McGorry, Roberto Limongi and Michael Mackinley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open.

Countries where authors publish in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Schizophrenia Bulletin Open with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Schizophrenia Bulletin Open more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025