Sartre Studies International

205 papers and 286 indexed citations i.

About

The 205 papers published in Sartre Studies International in the last decades have received a total of 286 indexed citations. Papers published in Sartre Studies International usually cover Philosophy (111 papers), History (68 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (45 papers) specifically the topics of Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (93 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (63 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (33 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sartre Studies International are Beata Stawarska, Luna Dolezal, John H. Gillespie, Neil Roberts, Kathryn T. Gines, Gavin Rae, Thomas R. Flynn, Steve Martinot, Robert Bernasconi and Dennis A. Gilbert.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sartre Studies International

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sartre Studies International. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sartre Studies International.

Countries where authors publish in Sartre Studies International

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sartre Studies International. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sartre Studies International with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sartre Studies International more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025