Gavin Rae
Impact in
- Philosophy top 5%
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Papers in
- Philosophy 30
- Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism 16
- Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre 5
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 4
-
- Political Theology and Sovereignty 9
- Journals
- Human Studies (6 papers)Critical Horizons (4 papers)History of the Human Sciences (3 papers)Philosophy & Social Criticism (3 papers)Sophia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainEgyptUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Gavin Rae
37 papers receiving 184 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Philosophy 70
- Cultural Studies 22
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 31
- Geography, Planning and Development 13
- Sociology and Political Science 85
Countries citing papers authored by Gavin Rae
This map shows the geographic impact of Gavin Rae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gavin Rae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gavin Rae more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gavin Rae
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gavin Rae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gavin Rae. The network helps show where Gavin Rae may publish in the future.
No co-authors to show.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2010 | 21 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 16 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 16 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 7 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 6 | |
| 12 | Ontology in Heidegger and Deleuze: A Comparative Analysis | 2014 | 6 |
| 13 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2012 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 19 | Violence, Territorialization, and Signification: The Political from Carl Schmitt and Gilles Deleuze | 2013 | 3 |
| 20 | 2018 | 3 |
About Gavin Rae
Gavin Rae is a scholar working on Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 43 papers that have together received 196 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (16 papers), Hannah Arendt's Political Philosophy (12 papers), Political Theology and Sovereignty (9 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (9 papers), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (7 papers), Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre (5 papers), Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (5 papers) and Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (70 citations), Cultural Studies (22 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (31 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (13 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (85 citations). Gavin Rae has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Egypt and United Kingdom. Their work appears in journals such as Human Studies, Critical Horizons, History of the Human Sciences, Philosophy & Social Criticism and Sophia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.