Archiv für Kulturgeschichte

368 papers and 383 indexed citations i.

About

The 368 papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte in the last decades have received a total of 383 indexed citations. Papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte usually cover History (128 papers), Classics (113 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (92 papers) specifically the topics of Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (90 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (44 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (40 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte are Herbert Grundmann, Jürgen Osterhammel, Arnold Esch, Hans‐Joachim Gehrke, Joachim Wollasch, Heinz Duchhardt, Gerhard Neumann, Andreas Wirsching, Helmut Beumann and Richard Walsh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte.

Countries where authors publish in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Archiv für Kulturgeschichte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Archiv für Kulturgeschichte more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025