Sefarad
Impact in
Papers in
In The Last Decade
Sefarad
277 papers receiving 552 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Classics 178
- History 390
- Religious studies 181
- Archeology 274
- Philosophy 193
Countries where authors publish in Sefarad
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sefarad. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sefarad with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sefarad more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Sefarad
This network shows the impact of papers published in Sefarad. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sefarad.
About Sefarad
The 553 papers published in Sefarad in the last decades have received a total of 975 indexed citations . Papers published in Sefarad usually cover Classics (84 papers), History (224 papers), Archeology (193 papers), Religious studies (75 papers) and General Arts and Humanities (13 papers) specifically the topics of Historical and Linguistic Studies (178 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (110 papers), Sephardic Jews and Inquisition Studies (108 papers), Historical Studies of Medieval Iberia (88 papers), Medieval Iberian Studies (80 papers), Archaeological and Historical Studies (77 papers), Language, Linguistics, Cultural Analysis (69 papers) and Medieval and Early Modern Iberia (64 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sefarad are Moshé Lazar, Natalio Fernández Marcos, Michelle M. Hamilton, Paul Fenton, Souraya Sidani, Christine L. Covell, David Romano, Shlomo Sela, Andrés Enrique‐Arias and Albrecht Hempel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.