Salud Pública de México

2.6k papers and 33.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Salud Pública de México in the last decades have received a total of 33.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Salud Pública de México usually cover General Health Professions (903 papers), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (605 papers) and Epidemiology (379 papers) specifically the topics of Health and Lifestyle Studies (456 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (184 papers) and Public Health and Social Inequalities (158 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Salud Pública de México are Eduardo Lazcano‐Ponce, Julio Frenk, Juan A Rivera, Teresa Shamah‐Levy, Octavio Gómez Dantés, Mauricio Hernández‐Ávila, Sı́món Barquera, Salvador Villalpando, Hector Gómez‐Dantés and Juan Pablo Gutiérrez.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Salud Pública de México

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Salud Pública de México. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Salud Pública de México.

Countries where authors publish in Salud Pública de México

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Salud Pública de México. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Salud Pública de México with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Salud Pública de México more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025