Countries where authors publish in New Zealand Journal of Botany
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Zealand Journal of Botany. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Zealand Journal of Botany more than expected).
Fields of papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany
This network shows the impact of papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany.
About New Zealand Journal of Botany
The 2.6k papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany in the last decades have received a total of 41.9k indexed citations . Papers published in New Zealand Journal of Botany usually cover Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (999 papers), Nature and Landscape Conservation (296 papers), Plant Science (1k papers), Cell Biology (235 papers) and Forestry (45 papers) specifically the topics of Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (546 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (477 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (356 papers), Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (235 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (235 papers), Plant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics (194 papers), Fern and Epiphyte Biology (127 papers) and Plant Reproductive Biology (119 papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Zealand Journal of Botany are P. Wardle, David G. Lloyd, Henry Eamonn Connor, Stanley J. Hughes, Fred R. Ganders, ALAN F. MARK, C. J. Burrows, N. T. Moar, E. J. Godley and Rajni N. Patel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.