Journal of Forestry Research

3.0k papers and 31.3k indexed citations i.

About

The 3.0k papers published in Journal of Forestry Research in the last decades have received a total of 31.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Forestry Research usually cover Nature and Landscape Conservation (1.0k papers), Plant Science (1.0k papers) and Global and Planetary Change (905 papers) specifically the topics of Forest ecology and management (599 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (469 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (354 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Forestry Research are Guofan Shao, Lina Tang, Timo Pukkala, Sha Huang, Joseph P. Hupy, Yang Wang, Cecil C. Konijnendijk, Jiaojun Zhu, Guangyu Wang and Evgenios Agathokleous.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Forestry Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Forestry Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Forestry Research.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Forestry Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Forestry Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Forestry Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Forestry Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025