Bertold Spuler
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Byzantine Studies and History
- Anthropology top 2%
- Eurasian Exchange Networks
Papers in
-
- Islamic Studies and History 14
- Polish Historical and Cultural Studies 10
- Anthropology 30
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 19
- Co-authors
- Nicholas Poppe (1 shared paper)A. J. Arberry (1 shared paper)George Miles (1 shared paper)George Vernadsky (1 shared paper)Robert Hoyland (1 shared paper)Seema Alavi (1 shared paper)Johannes Berger (1 shared paper)Werner Ende (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Bertold Spuler
66 papers receiving 341 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Classics 105
- Anthropology 213
- Archeology 166
- Religious studies 43
- Political Science and International Relations 198
Countries citing papers authored by Bertold Spuler
This map shows the geographic impact of Bertold Spuler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bertold Spuler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bertold Spuler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Bertold Spuler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bertold Spuler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bertold Spuler. The network helps show where Bertold Spuler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Bertold Spuler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 93 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1954 | 90 | |
| 2 | 1961 | 51 | |
| 3 | 1958 | 27 | |
| 4 | 1961 | 24 | |
| 5 | 1961 | 23 | |
| 6 | 1952 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1954 | 23 | |
| 8 | 1952 | 22 | |
| 9 | 1971 | 21 | |
| 10 | Die Mongolen in Iran : Politik, Verwaltung und Kultur der Ilchanzeit 1220-1350 | 1985 | 18 |
| 11 | 1970 | 15 | |
| 12 | Rulers and governments of the world | 1977 | 14 |
| 13 | 1952 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 13 | |
| 15 | 1952 | 12 | |
| 16 | 1954 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1964 | 11 | |
| 18 | 1952 | 11 | |
| 19 | İran Moğolları : siyaset, idare ve kültür İlhanlılar devri, 1220-1350 | 1957 | 8 |
| 20 | 1957 | 8 |
About Bertold Spuler
Bertold Spuler is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Anthropology, Archeology, Sociology and Political Science and Language and Linguistics, having authored 93 papers that have together received 575 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eurasian Exchange Networks (19 papers), Archaeology and Historical Studies (19 papers), Islamic Studies and History (14 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (11 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (10 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (9 papers), Linguistics and Cultural Studies (9 papers) and Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (105 citations), Anthropology (213 citations), Archeology (166 citations), Religious studies (43 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (198 citations). Bertold Spuler has collaborated with scholars based in Germany and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Nicholas Poppe, A. J. Arberry, George Miles, George Vernadsky, Robert Hoyland, Seema Alavi, Johannes Berger, Werner Ende, Richard N. Frye and James A. Bellamy. Their work appears in journals such as Oriens, Die Welt des Islams, Der Islam, Iranian Studies and Slavic Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.