Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques

192 citations
198 papers · · active since 1952

Impact in

    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Medieval Literature and History

Papers in

    • Medieval Philosophy and Theology 81
    • Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 16
    • Karl Barth and Christian Theology 15
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 13
    • Medieval Literature and History 14

Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques

74 papers receiving 106 citations

Peers

Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Philosophy 102
  • Classics 21
  • Religious studies 24
  • History 39
  • Anthropology 10
Replace LIT Literature Interpretation Theory with:
LIT Literature Interpretation Theory United States
Journal of Narrative Theory United States
Gothic Studies United Kingdom
Revista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos Canada
Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía Spain
French forum United States
Journal of Romance Studies United Kingdom
Mosaic United States
Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques United States
Oxford German Studies United Kingdom
Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques relative to LIT Literature Interpretation Theory United States LIT Literature Interpretation Theory's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
LIT Literature Interpretation Theory · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques.

About Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques

The 198 papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques in the last decades have received a total of 192 indexed citations . Papers published in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques usually cover Philosophy (150 papers), Classics (19 papers), History (39 papers), Religious studies (17 papers) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (13 papers) specifically the topics of Medieval Philosophy and Theology (81 papers), Catholicism and Religious Studies (20 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (16 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (15 papers), Medieval Literature and History (14 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (13 papers), Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (12 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (11 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques are Antoine Picon, Cristina D’Ancona, Riccardo Chiaradonna, Emmanuel Falque, Gerd Van Riel, Alain de Libéra, Gilbert Dahan, Annie Petit, Alain Boureau and Fergus Kerr.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact