LIT Literature Interpretation Theory

392 papers and 580 indexed citations i.

About

The 392 papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory in the last decades have received a total of 580 indexed citations. Papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory usually cover Literature and Literary Theory (215 papers), Sociology and Political Science (106 papers) and Cultural Studies (72 papers) specifically the topics of Contemporary Literature and Criticism (53 papers), Gothic Literature and Media Analysis (38 papers) and American and British Literature Analysis (26 papers). The most active scholars publishing in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory are Gerry Canavan, Susan Watkins, Roberta Rubenstein, Pamela K. Gilbert, Donald B. Gibson, Terry Brown, Mark Llewellyn, Min Hyoung Song, Rebecca Pope and Marta Caminero‐Santangelo.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory.

Countries where authors publish in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in LIT Literature Interpretation Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites LIT Literature Interpretation Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025