Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

15.4k citations
1.7k papers · · active since 2017

Impact in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Hematology top 5%
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Papers in

    • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management 319
    • Hemophilia Treatment and Research 267
    • Platelet Disorders and Treatments 240
    • Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms 177

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

1.2k papers receiving 12.9k citations

Peers

Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis
Comparison fields: 5 of 176
  • Internal Medicine 3.6k
  • Hematology 5.3k
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 2.4k
  • Genetics 1.1k
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 433
Replace Hämostaseologie with:
Hämostaseologie Germany
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology United States
Journal of Medical Economics United States
Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/Hemostasis United States
Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnętrznej Poland
Best Practice & Research Clinical Haematology United States
Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation Germany
Internal and Emergency Medicine Italy
Platelets United States
Expert Review of Hematology United States
Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis relative to Hämostaseologie Germany Hämostaseologie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4.2×
Hämostaseologie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

About Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis

The 1.7k papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis in the last decades have received a total of 15.4k indexed citations . Papers published in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis usually cover Internal Medicine (319 papers), Hematology (636 papers), Genetics (104 papers), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (163 papers) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (33 papers) specifically the topics of Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (319 papers), Hemophilia Treatment and Research (267 papers), Platelet Disorders and Treatments (240 papers), Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms (177 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (94 papers), Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Thrombosis (85 papers), Coagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema (58 papers) and Complement system in diseases (55 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis are Silvio Antoniak, Cihan Ay, Alisa Wolberg, Ingrid Pabinger, Mary Cushman, Marlien Pieters, Florian Moik, Ton Lisman, Stephan Nopp and Suzanne C. Cannegieter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact